https://www.faktisk.no/notiser/Kz/det-ma-ikke-koste-692-kr-per-dag-a-pendle-sandefjordoslo (an example of our brand new short format)
https://twitter.com/i/moments/1170089312958001156 (an example of our "live-check" effort on Twitter during the local elections in Norway in September)
https://www.faktisk.no/artikler/EnJ/vi-fulgte-den-siste-partilederdebatten (an example of our live-check summary story during the local elections in Norway in September)
https://www.faktisk.no/artikler/pYg/fem-ting-du-bor-vite-om-eiendomsskatt (an example of our election-related fact stories during the local elections in Norway in September)
https://www.faktisk.no/faktasjekker/ApA/ap-har-doblet-eiendomsskatten-i-bergen (Fact check)
https://www.faktisk.no/faktasjekker/DLW/jo-meslinger-har-drept-mennesker-i-den-vestlige-verden-de-siste-20-arene (Fact check)
https://www.faktisk.no/faktasjekker/1bw/bare-18-prosent-av-elevene-i-oslo-har-gode-nok-karakterer-til-a-velge-hvilken-skole-de-vil-ga-pa (Fact check)
https://www.faktisk.no/faktasjekker/YAb/nei-olav-thon-har-ikke-investert-850-millioner-kroner-i-bitcoin-program (Fact check)
https://www.faktisk.no/faktasjekker/MWL/det-har-vaert-en-dobling-i-antall-loggforte-knivstikkinger-i-oslo-politidistrikt-sammenlignet-med-sa (Fact check)
https://www.faktisk.no/faktasjekker/8Rb/kongeparken-og-tusenfryd-gir-5-gratis-billetter-til-alle-i-anledning-35-arsjubileum (Fact check)
We follow the IFCN Code of Principles, as well as the journalistic ethic guidelines of the Norwegian Press Association. Also, we have made our own open guidelines stated openly here: https://www.faktisk.no/metode/
In short, we identify, pick and fact check important, surprising, interesting and/or influential factual claims made in the public domain - including the political discussion, in the media, in social medias e.t.c. We also strive to uncover and stop the spread of so called "false news" and "alternative facts".
When fact checking, we give the subjects who has made the claims an early opportunity verify context and support their claims with documentation.
After fact checking, we conclude with one of our five categories: True, Partly true, Not sure, Partly false of False.
If the claim is found mostly true, not sure, mostly false or false, the subject of the fact check is given the opportunity to comment the conclusion.
Also, based on our experience after one year of fact-checking, we have included a scale-free category for in depth insight fact-checks were it is impossible to conclude, or were a categoric conclusion would be counter productive in regards of highlighting the facts. These insight-articles are marked with a blue color.
We also produce video fact-checks an explainers for use on Facebook and Snap Chat. During big debates, we live-check on Twitter.
* We also cooperate with the public broadcaster NRK with a short segment called "this weeks fact check" for their senior audience radio channel P1+.
All our fact checks are free for all to use and equipped with embed-codes for easy reproduction. They are also distributed through the Norwegian news wire NTB.